SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome

SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome

  • Downloads:2891
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-06-09 09:54:13
  • Update Date:2025-09-07
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Mary Beard
  • ISBN:0871404230
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

Ancient Rome was an imposing city even by modern standards, a sprawling imperial metropolis of more than a million inhabitants, a "mixture of luxury and filth, liberty and exploitation, civic pride and murderous civil war" that served as the seat of power for an empire that spanned from Spain to Syria。 Yet how did all this emerge from what was once an insignificant village in central Italy? In S。P。Q。R。, world-renowned classicist Mary Beard narrates the unprecedented rise of a civilization that even two thousand years later still shapes many of our most fundamental assumptions about power, citizenship, responsibility, political violence, empire, luxury, and beauty。 From the foundational myth of Romulus and Remus to 212 ce―nearly a thousand years later―when the emperor Caracalla gave Roman citizenship to every free inhabitant of the empire, S。P。Q。R。 (the abbreviation of "The Senate and People of Rome") examines not just how we think of ancient Rome but challenges the comfortable historical perspectives that have existed for centuries by exploring how the Romans thought of themselves: how they challenged the idea of imperial rule, how they responded to terrorism and revolution, and how they invented a new idea of citizenship and nation。 Opening the book in 63 BCE with the famous clash between the populist aristocrat Catiline and Cicero, the renowned politician and orator, Beard animates this “terrorist conspiracy,” which was aimed at the very heart of the Republic, demonstrating how this singular event would presage the struggle between democracy and autocracy that would come to define much of Rome’s subsequent history。 Illustrating how a classical democracy yielded to a self-confident and self-critical empire, S。P。Q。R。 reintroduces us, though in a wholly different way, to famous and familiar characters―Hannibal, Julius Caesar, Cleopatra, Augustus, and Nero, among others―while expanding the historical aperture to include those overlooked in traditional histories: the women, the slaves and ex-slaves, conspirators, and those on the losing side of Rome’s glorious conquests。 Like the best detectives, Beard sifts fact from fiction, myth and propaganda from historical record, refusing either simple admiration or blanket condemnation。 Far from being frozen in marble, Roman history, she shows, is constantly being revised and rewritten as our knowledge expands。 Indeed, our perceptions of ancient Rome have changed dramatically over the last fifty years, and S。P。Q。R。, with its nuanced attention to class inequality, democratic struggles, and the lives of entire groups of people omitted from the historical narrative for centuries, promises to shape our view of Roman history for decades to come。

Download

Reviews

Mark

It’s worth pointing out that SPQR is primarily about Rome - the city rather than Rome - the Empire。 Mary Beard describes how in the infancy of Rome - the city, a clan, then a small kingdom blossomed into the Republic and expanded into the empire, and how this dramatic change influenced the city over the centuries。 While some parts of the history feel rushed or glossed over, other key events or periods are covered in remarkable detail。 The prose is exciting and scholarly without being patronising It’s worth pointing out that SPQR is primarily about Rome - the city rather than Rome - the Empire。 Mary Beard describes how in the infancy of Rome - the city, a clan, then a small kingdom blossomed into the Republic and expanded into the empire, and how this dramatic change influenced the city over the centuries。 While some parts of the history feel rushed or glossed over, other key events or periods are covered in remarkable detail。 The prose is exciting and scholarly without being patronising。 I recommend SPQR for amateur history buff。 。。。more

Daniel

This is an interesting revisionist view at the Roman empire。 Beard makes some very good points about the evolution of the empire—essentially that its growth was both planned and the result of random events。 Beard's writing is lucid and mostly relevant; I found myself skipping over introductory elements to most sections because they seemed superfluous and sometimes simplistic。 Aside from that, it was an interesting and sometimes compelling read that offers some fresh insights into a topic that mo This is an interesting revisionist view at the Roman empire。 Beard makes some very good points about the evolution of the empire—essentially that its growth was both planned and the result of random events。 Beard's writing is lucid and mostly relevant; I found myself skipping over introductory elements to most sections because they seemed superfluous and sometimes simplistic。 Aside from that, it was an interesting and sometimes compelling read that offers some fresh insights into a topic that most of us know only in passing。 。。。more

Amparo

Primer milenio de Roma y lo romano con la visión amplia, miscelánica y siempre interesante de Beard。

Amelia Valentino

2。5 stars。 Some chapters are Hit or miss。 I found it overall too broad。 I think I prefer a cultural/political history to following emperors and kings。 I enjoyed Cicero and Caesar sections and home front and cultural analysis。Quarantine read。

Dee Sanfilippo

I learned a lot from this book。 It is engaging enough to have kept me focused and interested, even though I've never had any interested in ancient Rome before。 Mary Beard's writing style reminds me of the better professors I had in college, those who could make you want to know more just from their enthusiasm。 Particularly good at presenting alternate versions of things, she encourages readers to review their previous understanding。I got a bit ready to move to the next book on my shelf, but this I learned a lot from this book。 It is engaging enough to have kept me focused and interested, even though I've never had any interested in ancient Rome before。 Mary Beard's writing style reminds me of the better professors I had in college, those who could make you want to know more just from their enthusiasm。 Particularly good at presenting alternate versions of things, she encourages readers to review their previous understanding。I got a bit ready to move to the next book on my shelf, but this did not happen until the Epilogue。 If you have any curiosity about the topic, you'll enjoy this book。 。。。more

Hélder Filipe

Com a leitura deste livro ganhei enorme respeito pela historiadora Mary Beard, pela sua honestidade intelectual e pela forma como não adopta conclusões fáceis sem antes apresentar as suas dúvidas em relação a algumas questões。

Anne Boleyn

Gayet kapsamlı,açıklayıcı ve Antik Roma'ya giriş için yararlı bir kitaptı。 Gayet kapsamlı,açıklayıcı ve Antik Roma'ya giriş için yararlı bir kitaptı。 。。。more

Paige Nicole

DNF at 23%This book has sat untouched on my nightstand for like 4 months now。 I was enjoying it, so I’m not sure why I didn’t feel compelled to read it。 Hopefully I’ll pick it up again someday, but I need to accept that today is not that day。

Morgan

Reads like a ramble。 Too meandering for a history sorta book for me。

Wesley Schweig

Het gaat over het begin en de piek van het Romeinse rijk。 Sommige delen zijn erg goed omschreven tot in de kleine details。 Je krijgt een levendig beeld van het oude Rome。 Mary gebruikt veel bronnen ter bevestiging van haar visie op bepaalde onderwerpen en houdt sommige delen ter interpretatie over aan de lezer。 Must reed voor iemand die eens in het klassieke Rome wilt duiken

Ryan Young

Easy to read review of the 'first roman millennium,' from about 750 bce to 214 ce。 beard tells us what we can understand from the available evidence, but also what we can understand about how the romans understood themselves。 it's mind bending to consider that the roman historians of the first century bce were looking back on 700 years of their own history。 beard is thorough and objective。 Easy to read review of the 'first roman millennium,' from about 750 bce to 214 ce。 beard tells us what we can understand from the available evidence, but also what we can understand about how the romans understood themselves。 it's mind bending to consider that the roman historians of the first century bce were looking back on 700 years of their own history。 beard is thorough and objective。 。。。more

Alex

The book calls itself "A History of Ancient Rome" and while I did gain a great many pockets of insight into what life was like in the Roman Empire, the narrative as a whole failed to comprehensively educate me in the way I had hoped。 Beard is constantly straddling between frustratingly generalistic and needlessly specific。 This book is for those who already have some sound understanding of Ancient Rome, for whom it might provide a zesty experience but for others, this book is not, as it self-dec The book calls itself "A History of Ancient Rome" and while I did gain a great many pockets of insight into what life was like in the Roman Empire, the narrative as a whole failed to comprehensively educate me in the way I had hoped。 Beard is constantly straddling between frustratingly generalistic and needlessly specific。 This book is for those who already have some sound understanding of Ancient Rome, for whom it might provide a zesty experience but for others, this book is not, as it self-declares, a beginner's guide to the history of ancient rome。 。。。more

Nora

Couldn’t finish this one

Somer Set

Audiobook。 An overview of ancient Rome, their politicians, poets, and people。

Carrie

It took me literally years to finish (with numerous months-long gaps), but I am glad I stuck with it。

Mary

Very interesting。 Well written。 I appreciated her analysis and her inclusion of information about the role of women and their daily lives。

Felipe

Aburridisimo, habla de mucha historia y muchisimos personajes

Ross Sheddon

Lots of interesting stuff。

H。 'Foca' Iamarino

As the author herself states at the epilogue this is the work of her lifetime as a researcher on Ancient Rome。 In if you’re into the topic you know MARY BEARD。 And if you do not you definitely don’t know nearly enough。 That being said it’s a MUST READ — Salve Mary Beard, always precious!

Miguel

Fantastic book。 I wouldn’t say it dives into the nitty gritty details of certain important events in Roman history, don’t expect a play by play of the Battle of Pharsalus or anything。 However, I think this book excels at talking about how to think about Rome and the Romans。 It is really quite honest about how much we can possibly know about Rome。 For example, our idea of the early to mid 1st Century BCE is likely to be from Cicero’s perspective, as he was the most prolific writer of the time。 It Fantastic book。 I wouldn’t say it dives into the nitty gritty details of certain important events in Roman history, don’t expect a play by play of the Battle of Pharsalus or anything。 However, I think this book excels at talking about how to think about Rome and the Romans。 It is really quite honest about how much we can possibly know about Rome。 For example, our idea of the early to mid 1st Century BCE is likely to be from Cicero’s perspective, as he was the most prolific writer of the time。 It looks into how much of Roman history is shrouded in myth, and why Romans may have had many reasons to maintain some of these myths and legends for political purposes in their own times。 I really liked how it explores the ways in which Romans dealt with the multiculturalism and influx of other cultures。 These myths and legends and being able to say they were your ancestors is quite recognizable。 Many groups today will like to call back to some golden era upon which to ground some nationalism or sense of pride。 There’s just so much to this book that I can’t praise it enough。 。。。more

Charli

Honestly, has Mary Beard ever put out a bad book? The answer is no, no she has not。

Madeline

While I enjoyed Beard's writing style and story-telling ability, eventually I tired of her desire to cast suspicions on ideals, events, people, and writings that have been traditionally praised。 In moderation, skepticism makes a historian more credible, but it became her default。 Some key quotes:On how military prowess isn't that great:"。。。despire the almost mystical modern admiration for Hannibal's battle plans at Cannae, which are still on thr syllabus of military academies, they amount to lit While I enjoyed Beard's writing style and story-telling ability, eventually I tired of her desire to cast suspicions on ideals, events, people, and writings that have been traditionally praised。 In moderation, skepticism makes a historian more credible, but it became her default。 Some key quotes:On how military prowess isn't that great:"。。。despire the almost mystical modern admiration for Hannibal's battle plans at Cannae, which are still on thr syllabus of military academies, they amount to little more than a clever version of going round the back of the enemy。 This was the one trick that ancient generals always tried if they could。。。。" (183)。 (As if we praise Hannibal for the mere idea of flanking, and not its flawless execution on a chaotic battlefield。)On how works of philosophy weren't that great:"The philosophical Thoughts of the emperor Marcus Aurelius, cliché as much of it is。。。。" (399)。 (Philosophers often wrote "clichés" because they knew people don't need new advice, but to be reminded of the old advice。)On how you shouldn't trust people who cry for liberty:"。。。fine-sounding ideas of liberty, which might amount to not much more than an alibi for elite self-interest and the continued exploitation of the underclass。。。。" (338)。 (She's showing her hand a little too much here。)There are dozens of similar examples。 。。。more

Halvor Harnæs

Ryddig og innholdsrik oversikt om romernes historie fram til første par hundre årene etter Kristus med særlig vekt på de siste hundre årene til republikken。 I tillegg til at alle de kjente sentrale personene er med, så får vi en fin beskrivelse av romersk hverdagsliv。

Brian Hogan

Author's knowledge of so many details of rulers amazes me that I couldn't keep up with where I was in the timeline and who succeeded who。 This could have been divided into 3 books。 It's probably just me but it was not an easy read。 Author's knowledge of so many details of rulers amazes me that I couldn't keep up with where I was in the timeline and who succeeded who。 This could have been divided into 3 books。 It's probably just me but it was not an easy read。 。。。more

Mark

Similar to how the Romans studied Greek history as a vehicle to look inwards, the reader of SPQR can quickly see the parallels with today's dominant culture under a Pax Americana。 Both the evolution and common themes of human civilization are presented in an often entertaining way- multiculturalism, political violence, how Christianity used to be the persecuted, the tension between the Roman tradition and "new" norms, elitism and social inequalities。 Some of these dynamics at once strike a chord Similar to how the Romans studied Greek history as a vehicle to look inwards, the reader of SPQR can quickly see the parallels with today's dominant culture under a Pax Americana。 Both the evolution and common themes of human civilization are presented in an often entertaining way- multiculturalism, political violence, how Christianity used to be the persecuted, the tension between the Roman tradition and "new" norms, elitism and social inequalities。 Some of these dynamics at once strike a chord of recognition while resonating in a slightly uncomfortable way- like they hit too close to home。 (But, I still have no clue as to why the US Federal Bureau of Prisons named their covid Vax data system "Tiberius" 😳) 。。。more

Finntastic Explanations

Truly excellent。 Mary Beard brings classical scholarship into an interesting conversational context。 This allows people to really engage with the material at many levels that makes her book unique。 The work she put into this book is also admirable, she even ended with her thoughts on over fifty years of learning about Romans。 This is an excellent choice for anyone looking to learn more about the Roman people。 Truly worth the entire read, and I rarely say that。 Thanks Mary Beard!

Jairo Gomez

A book that retales the history of one of the most influential empires, culturally, politically, and militarily。Influential, yet not one to be romanticized。An ancient civilization that paved the way to the constructs of our contemporary society。 The Roman Empire。 A Rome of kings and emperors, geographic expansion, and military might。 The books title, SPQR, refers to the Latin expression “Senatus Populusque Romanus” (The senate and the people of Rome)。 A four letter acronym coined by the Romans, A book that retales the history of one of the most influential empires, culturally, politically, and militarily。Influential, yet not one to be romanticized。An ancient civilization that paved the way to the constructs of our contemporary society。 The Roman Empire。 A Rome of kings and emperors, geographic expansion, and military might。 The books title, SPQR, refers to the Latin expression “Senatus Populusque Romanus” (The senate and the people of Rome)。 A four letter acronym coined by the Romans, and I mean that literally, as it was printed it on their currency, buildings, capturing the essence of the republic turned empire。 Rome, the senate, and its people。 Mary beard, a classics professor at the university of Cambridge, gives us an extensive and extremely well written book on the history of the Roman Empire, from its inception around 750bc。The book starts with the mythos of the City’s origins and its founders, and then goes to provide insights into Romans economy, its currency, military, and politics。 Using Cicero’s eloquent case on the senate against Catilina, she draws parallels to the contemporary political discourse still present in our modern world。The book also covers a list of topics which are surprisingly still echoed in today’s public debate from social liberties to the right of citizenship, which was used as a mechanism to evangelize and spread Roman ideas。Beard also covers the inherent bias in history texts which often get to be written by the victors, fabricating truths and amplifying lies to fit a narrative which ultimately becomes part of the fabric of our past。 In the case of Roman ancient history, this gap was amplified by the lack of historical texts and archeological evidence。 Stories were then left to be told by historians like Livy, who lived hundreds of years after the events had occurred; blurred by the passage of time and adopting the tone, personal biases and favoritism of its authors。All in all, Beard makes the book highly approachable considering the broad audience the book appears to be written for, and the fact that she effectively summarizes a thousand years of history in around 600 pages。 It is her thesis against classics views on the Roman Empire, which she contrasts with recent archeological evidence and the right dose of skepticism。Though it may seem like a heavy read, It is definitely one you’ll enjoy, as it appeals to the need for contextualizing our present by understanding our past。 Highly recommended! 。。。more

natalia nitras

it took me half a year but it was totally worth it

Tim

This book is not an overview of Roman history。 It will not make you significantly more familiar with Roman history than you probably already are。 What is it then? I’m not entirely sure as it seems to try to be multiple things at the same time and doesn’t ever fully succeed in any of them。It doesn’t tell any interesting stories about Rome or the people that once lived there。 It doesn’t give you a historical overview of the empire。 What it does try to do and success best at in the second half of t This book is not an overview of Roman history。 It will not make you significantly more familiar with Roman history than you probably already are。 What is it then? I’m not entirely sure as it seems to try to be multiple things at the same time and doesn’t ever fully succeed in any of them。It doesn’t tell any interesting stories about Rome or the people that once lived there。 It doesn’t give you a historical overview of the empire。 What it does try to do and success best at in the second half of the book, is examine the broad arcs of Roman history。 The big issue is that these broad picture examinations could have been done much more concisely and efficiently。 I feel like if I’m going to read a 700 pg book on Roman history, I’d like to come out knowing a pretty good deal about Roman history。 I feel like what I got instead was a slightly better understanding of the progression of Rome through history, from small riverside village - to emerging local power ruled by chieftains or “kings” - to an aristocratic republic - and finally to an autocratic empire。The problem is that I pretty much just summed up what the book was able to teach me in about 2 sentences。 Beard’s meandering prose that will sometimes try to use historical examples from individuals who lived centuries apart makes it so that even the examples she does provide become confusing very quickly。 Her best sections were in examining Cicero and Pliny。 I think her book would have been better as an analysis of two of Rome’s most famous and prolific writers as that seems to be where she was most in her element。As it stands, this book can’t get more than 2 stars from me。 。。。more

Stuart Smith

Fascinating insight。 Ms。 Beard is a superb historian。 This was a joy to read。